MOCK TRIAL ASSIGNMENT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

MOCK TRIAL ASSIGNMENT - Essay ExampleSeveral questions must be addressed so that the plaintiff is assured of a amusement park face in the courts. The background of the jurors is important to note when selecting the potential ones for representation (Walter and James). Firstly, the level of education is of paramount importance. Of pivotal value also is the sum up of members in the family as well as spouses. This activity of asking such questions tries to investigate any prejudices that may be hidden which could authorize to the negation of a fair trial. For instance a jury could have been a victim of such a case in the past and then this aspect may lead to ultimate bias directed towards the defendant thus spoiling the relevance of the case under question. On the other hand, the defendant should likewise exercise solicitude in the selection of the jury to safeguard the rights bestowed in him. The reason behind such undertaking is to prevent unfair circumstances that hamper admini stration of umpire to the aggrieved parties. For example, the defendant in this case must ask about the family members of the potential juror since it can be so coincidental that one of the parties to which he has a relationship leads in a certain insurance company and so on. This could pose challenges because the potential juror may sway favoritism towards the defendant hence no instance of justice would be encountered. The jury out to exhibit dire competence at all costs as well as professionalism to the parties, the defendant and the plaintiff. 2.0 Opening Statement for the Defendants As the case before us exhibits, there is a lot of negligence on the part of the plaintiff. From the instructions presumption by the manufacturer, 1-4B has titanicly been used in the manufacture products in the household platform yet for it to turn dangerous in its GHB form large amounts have to be ingested in very high quantities (Andrew). Notably, production of Princess Beads doesnt use high lev els of this element thus this renders the plaintiffs drive baseless. Additionally, we expressed our responsibility by giving reliable warning information concerning the product hence the plaintiff negligently dismissed this aspect. To this respect, we cant be liable for the inconveniences neither the eventual death of the plaintiffs son, Joey Davis. Specifically, Princess Beads has been positioned strategically in the market to target children of older age than that of Joey we can neer be bound by any law to follow each somebody purchasing Princess Beads to make sure its used appropriately. Thus, its my view, that of the entire company that the plaintiff was responsible for the death of her son by not advising the caregivers to adhere to the instructions directed by the manufacturer. They ought to have played their supervisory role in the manner expected to prevent such unfortunate occurrences. If I was a member of the panel of the jury, I would elect an eloquent person to deliver the opening statement. The person should possess a convincing capacity with powerful elaboration skills so as to make sure that the points are delivered to the resolve in a sequential and orderly manner which is both convincing and reliable (Hamid). The ultimate efficiency with which the same is done therefore adds value to this case and will hence build a strong defense that in not easy to surpass. By so doing therefore, the foregoing will add indemnity points and also give a bearing to the